The methodology of the index has remained stable since its original conception in 2006, providing a basis for robust cross-country and time-series analysis. This year’s edition doesn’t introduce any change in the methodology. The 2021 results, therefore, can be seamlessly compared with those from previous years.
There are three basic concepts underlying the Global Gender Gap Index, forming the basis of how indicators were chosen, how the data is treated and how the scale can be used. First, the index focuses on measuring gaps rather than levels. Second, it captures gaps in outcome variables rather than gaps in input variables. Third, it ranks countries according to gender equality rather than women’s empowerment.
Gaps vs. levels
The index is designed to measure gender-based gaps in access to resources and opportunities in countries, rather than the actual levels of the available resources and opportunities in those countries. We do this to disassociate the Global Gender Gap Index from countries’ levels of development. In other words, the index is constructed to rank countries on their gender gaps not on their development level. For example, rich countries, generally speaking, are able to offer more education and health opportunities to all members of society, although this is quite independent of the gender-related gaps that may exist within those higher levels of health or education. The Global Gender Gap Index rewards countries for smaller gaps in access to these resources, regardless of the overall level of resources. Thus, in the case of education, for example, the index penalizes or rewards countries based on the size of the gap between male and female enrolment rates, but not for the overall levels of education in the country.
Outcomes versus inputs
The second basic concept underlying the Global Gender Gap Index is that it evaluates countries based on outcomes rather than inputs or means. Our aim is to provide a snapshot of where men and women stand with regard to some fundamental outcome indicators related to basic rights such as health, education, economic participation and political empowerment. Indicators related to country specific policies, rights, culture or customs—factors that we consider “input” or “means” indicators— are not included in the index but are discussed further in the analytic sections of this chapter, as well as featured in the report’s Economy Profiles. For example, the index includes an indicator comparing the gap between men and women in high-skilled jobs such as legislators, senior officials and managers (an outcome indicator) but does not include data on the length of maternity leave (a policy indicator).
This approach has contributed significantly to the index’s distinctiveness over the years and, we believe, continues to provide the most objective basis for discussing underlying contextual factors.37 Gender equality vs. women’s empowerment The third distinguishing feature of the Global Gender Gap Index is that it ranks countries according to their proximity to gender equality rather than to women’s empowerment. Our aim is to focus on whether the gap between women and men in the chosen indicators has declined, rather than whether women are winning the so-called “battle of the sexes”. Hence, the index rewards countries that reach the point where outcomes for women equal those for men, but it neither rewards nor penalizes cases in which women are outperforming men in particular indicators in some countries. Thus, a country that has higher enrolment for girls rather than boys in secondary school will score equal to a country where boys’ and girls’ enrolment is the same.
The Global Gender Gap Index examines the gap between men and women across four fundamental categories (subindexes): Economic Participation and Opportunity, Educational Attainment, Health and Survival, and Political Empowerment. Table B1 displays all four of these subindexes and the 14 indicators that compose them, along with the sources of data used for each.
Economic Participation and Opportunity
This subindex contains three concepts: the participation gap, the remuneration gap and the advancement gap. The participation gap is captured using the difference between women and men in labour force participation rates. The remuneration gap is captured through a hard data indicator (ratio of estimated female-to-male earned income)38 and a qualitative indicator gathered through the World Economic Forum’s annual Executive Opinion Survey (wage equality for similar work).39 Finally, the gap between the advancement of women and men is captured through two hard data statistics (the ratio of women to men among legislators, senior officials and managers, and the ratio of women to men among technical and professional workers).
Educational Attainment
This subindex captures the gap between women’s and men’s current access to education through ratios of women to men in primary-, secondary- and tertiary-level education. A longer-term view of the country’s ability to educate women and men in equal numbers is captured through the ratio of the female literacy rate to the male literacy rate.
Health and Survival
This subindex provides an overview of the differences between women’s and men’s health through the use of two indicators. The first is the sex ratio at birth, which aims specifically to capture the phenomenon of “missing women”, prevalent in many countries with a strong son preference.40 Second, we use the gap between women’s and men’s healthy life expectancy. This measure provides an estimate of the number of years that women and men can expect to live in good health by taking into account the years lost to violence, disease, malnutrition and other relevant factors.
Political Empowerment
This subindex measures the gap between men and women at the highest level of political decision-making through the ratio of women to men in ministerial positions and the ratio of women to men in parliamentary positions. In addition, we’ve included the ratio of women to men in terms of years in executive office (prime minister or president) for the last 50 years. A clear drawback in this category is the absence of any indicators capturing differences between the participation of women and men at local levels of government. Should such data become available at a globally comparative level in future years, it will be considered for inclusion in the index.
The overall Global Gender Gap Index is constructed using a four-step process, outlined below. Some of the indicators listed in Table B1 require specific standardization or modification in order to be used in the index. For further information on the indicator-specific calculations, please refer to Section B of this appendix.
Step 1. Convert to ratios: Initially, all data is converted to female-to-male ratios. For example, a country with 20% of women in ministerial positions is assigned a ratio of 20 women to 80 men, thus a value of 0.25. This is to ensure that the index is capturing gaps between women and men’s attainment levels, rather than the levels themselves.
Step 2. Data truncation at equality benchmark: The ratios obtained above are truncated at the “equality benchmark”. For all indicators, except the two health indicators, this equality benchmark is considered to be 1, meaning equal numbers of women and men. In the case of sex ratio at birth, the equality benchmark is set at 0.944,41 and in the case of healthy life expectancy the equality benchmark is set at 1.06 to capture that fact that women tend to naturally live longer than men. As such, parity is considered as achieved if, on average, women live five years longer than men.42
Truncating the data at the equality benchmarks for each assigns the same score to a country that has reached parity between women and men and one where women have surpassed men. The type of rating scale chosen determines whether the Index is rewarding women’s empowerment or gender equality.43 To capture gender equality, two possible scales were considered. One was a negative-positive scale capturing the size and direction of the gender gap. This scale penalizes either men’s advantage over women or women’s advantage over men and gives the highest points to absolute equality. The second choice was a one-sided scale that measures how close women are to reaching parity with men but does not reward or penalize countries for having a gender gap in the other direction. We find the one-sided scale more appropriate for our purposes, as it does not reward countries for having exceeded the parity benchmark. However, disparities in either direction are recorded in the Economy Profiles.
Step 3. Calculation of subindex scores: Each of the four subindexes is computed as the weighted average of the underlying individual indicators. Averaging the different indicators would implicitly give more weight to the measure that exhibits the largest variability or standard deviation. We therefore first normalize the indicators by equalizing their standard deviations. For example, within the Educational Attainment subindex, standard deviations for each of the four indicators are calculated. Then we determine what a 1% point change would translate to in terms of standard deviations by dividing 0.01 by the standard deviation for each indicator. These four values are then used as weights to calculate the weighted average of the four indicators. This way of weighting indicators allows us to make sure that each indicator has the same relative impact on the subindex. For example, an indicator with a small variability or standard deviation, such as primary enrolment rate, gets a larger weight within the Educational Attainment subindex than an indicator with a larger variability, such as tertiary enrolment rate. Therefore, a country with a large gender gap in primary education (an indicator where most countries have achieved near-parity. Between women and men) will be more heavily penalized. Similarly, in the case of the sex ratio at birth indicator (within the Health and Survival subindex), where most countries have a very high sex ratio and the spread of the data is small, the larger weight will penalize more heavily those countries that deviate from this value.
Table B2 displays the values of the weights used.44 Step 4. Calculation of final scores: For all subindexes, the highest possible score is 1 (gender parity) and the lowest possible score is 0 (imparity), thus binding the scores between inequality and equality benchmarks.45
A simple average of each subindex score is used to calculate the overall Global Gender Gap Index score. Similar to subindex scores, this final value ranges between 1 (parity) and 0 (imparity), thus allowing for comparisons relative to ideal standards of equality in addition to relative country rankings.46 The parity and imparity benchmarks remain fixed across time, allowing the reader to track individual country progress in relation to an ideal standard of equality. Furthermore, the option of roughly interpreting the final index scores as a percentage value that reveals how a country has reduced its gender gap should help make the index more intuitively appealing to readers.47
Labour force participation rate, %
Proportion of a country’s working-age (15–64) female population that engages actively in the labour market, either by working or looking for work. (i.e. ratio of the number of women participating in the labour force to total labour force). Labour force data doesn’t take into account workers employed abroad. It includes ILO estimates for missing data.
Period: 2019 or most recent year available
Source: International Labour Organization (ILO), ILOSTAT, modelled estimates.
Wage equality for similar work, 1–7 (best)
Response to the survey question, “In your country, for similar work, to what extent are wages for women equal to those of men?” (1 = not at all, significantly below those of men; 7 = fully, equal to those of men).
Period: 2019–2020 or most recent editions available
Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey (EOS).
Estimated earned income, int’l $1,000s
The estimated female earned income is a proxy for how much command women have over a country’s economic resources. For each country, it is computed using female and male shares of the economically active population, the ratio of the female to male wages (both sourced from (both indicators are sourced from ILO), gross domestic product valued at constant 2017 international dollars (IMF), and female and male shares of population (World Bank). The methodology used to compute this indicator is adapted from the methodology developed by the United Nations Development Programme’s Human Development Report Office for computing the Gender Development Index (UNDP, 2020, page 6-7). Female and male wage measures used in the computation of the gender wage ratio correspond to the mean nominal monthly earnings of female and male employees, respectively. In the absence of wage data, a gender wage ratio of 0.75 is used in the computation of the wage bill. ILO’s measure of earning corresponds to the mean of monthly earnings of all employees in nominal terms. The earnings of employees relate to the gross remuneration in cash and in kind paid to employees, as a rule at regular intervals, for time worked or work done together with remuneration for time not worked, such as annual vacation, other type of paid leave or holidays. Earnings exclude employers’ contributions in respect of their employees paid to social security and pension schemes and also the benefits received by employees under these schemes. Earnings also exclude severance and termination pay. Statistics of earnings relate to the gross remuneration of employees, i.e. the total before any deductions are made by the employer. The measurement period of this indicator corresponds to that of the wage data. In the economy profiles, the values reported are the estimated average annual earned income per capita in constant 2017 international dollars for women and men, respectively, and the ratio of the two values.
Period: 2019 or most recent year available
Sources: International Labour Organization (ILO), ILOSTAT database (accessed 1 February 2021); International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Economic Outlook (October 2020); World Bank, World Development Indicators (accessed 1 February 2021).
Legislators, senior officials and managers, %
Ratio of women to men employed in senior roles, defined by the International Labour Organization as those who plan, direct, coordinate and evaluate the overall activities of enterprises, governments and other organizations, or of organizational units within them, and formulate and review their policies, laws, rules and regulations. It corresponds to Major Group 1 of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08).48
Period: 2019 or most recent year available
Source: International Labour Organization (ILO), ILOSTAT database (accessed 18 January 2021).
Professional and technical workers, %
Ratio of women to men employed in professional and technical roles, defined by the International Labour Organization as those who increase the existing stock of knowledge, apply scientific or artistic concepts and theories or those who perform technical and related tasks that require advanced knowledge and skill. It corresponds to the sum of Major Groups 2 and 3 of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08).
Period: 2019 or most recent year available
Source: International Labour Organization (ILO), ILOSTAT database (accessed 18 January 2021).
Literacy rate, %
Percentage of the adult population (over 15 years of age) of each gender with the ability to both read and write and make simple arithmetic calculations.
Period: 2018 or most recent year available
Source: UNESCO, UIS.Stat education statistics data portal; when not available, data is sourced from United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Reports, most recent data available between 2008 and 2018.
Enrolment in primary education, %
Percentage of girls and boys in the official primary school age range (net rate) who are enrolled in primary education (International Standard Classification of Education [ISCED] 1).49
Period: 2018 or most recent year available
Source: UNESCO, UIS.Stat education statistics data portal.
Enrolment in secondary education, %
Percentage of girls and boys in the official secondary school age range (net rate) who are enrolled in secondary education (ISCED 2 and 3). It excludes ISCED 4, which is post-secondary, non-tertiary education. Whenever data on this indicator is not available, the “Percentage of students in secondary education (ISCED 2 and 3) who are female” variable is used instead.
Period: 2018 or most recent year available
Source: UNESCO, UIS.Stat education statistics data portal.
Enrolment in tertiary education, %
Total enrolment in tertiary education (gross rate), regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the most recent five-year age cohort that has left secondary school. Tertiary education consists of ISCED levels 5 to 8, and gross enrolment data should be examined within the context of a country structure regarding military service as well as propensity of students to seek education abroad.
Period: 2018 or most recent year available
Source: UNESCO, UIS.Stat education statistics data portal.
Sex ratio at birth, %
Sex ratio at birth refers to male births per female births. The data are 5-year averages.
Period: 2018
Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators.
Healthy life expectancy, years
Average number of years that a person of each gender can expect to live in full health, calculated by taking into account years lived in less than full health due to disease and/or injury.
Period: 2019 or most recent year available
Source: World Health Organization (WHO), Global Health Observatory Data Repository.
Women in parliament, %
Percentage of women holding parliamentary seats as a share of total parliamentary seats. In instances where a parliamentary system is bicameral, the figure used is the one for the lower house.
Period: Situation as of 1 January 2021
Source: Inter-parliamentary Union.
Women in ministerial positions, %
Percentage of women holding ministerial portfolios as a share of total ministry positions in each government. Some overlap between ministers and heads of government that also hold a ministerial portfolio may occur.
Period: Situation as of 1 January 2021
Source: Inter-parliamentary Union.
Years with female/male head of state (last 50)
The number of years in the past fifty-year period for which a woman has held a post equivalent to an elected head of state or head of government in the country. It takes into account prime ministers and/or presidents, royalties are not considered. It takes into account prime ministers and/or presidents, and royalties are not considered.
(Due to the fact that the 2021 edition of the Report comes out one-and-a-half year after the 2020 edition, the time-window used to compute the number of years with a female head of state moves by more than one year for all countries.)
Period: 1971-2020
Source: World Economic Forum’s calculations.
General Indicators
GDP, US$ billions
Gross domestic product in billions of current US dollars.
Period: 2020
Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook (WEO), October 2020 edition.
GDP per capita, constant ‘17, intl. $ 1000s
Gross domestic product per person at 2017 constant purchasing power parity (PPP).
Period: 2020
Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook (WEO), October 2020 edition.
Total population, million people
Estimate of the number of people of all ages living in a country, regardless of residency status or citizenship (except for refugees not permanently settled in the country of asylum who are generally considered part of the population of their country of origin).
Period: 2019
Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Population Prospects: The 2019 Revision.
Population growth rate, %
Year-on-year percentage change in total population, calculated based on current and previous year. It reflects the number of births and deaths during a period and the number of people migrating to and from a country.
Period: 2018–19
Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Population Prospects: The 2019 Revision.
Population sex ratio (female/ male), female/male ratio
Ratio of the number of females (thousands) to males (thousands) in the population of a society.
Period: 2019 or latest year available
Source: OECD, Employment database.
Work Participation and Leadership
Labour force, 1,000 people
Total number of people (by gender) participation in the labour force. The ratio is the percentage of women participating in the labour force with respect to the total labour force.
Period: 2019 or most recent year available
Source: World Economic Forum’s calculations based on International Labour Organization (ILO), ILOSTAT database (accessed 1 February 2021).
Unemployed adults, % of labour force (15–64)
Share of the labour force aged 15–64 of each gender that is without work but available for and seeking employment. Definitions of labour force and unemployment differ by country.
Period: 2019 or most recent year available
Source: International Labour Organization, ILOSTAT database (bulk download, accessed 24 January 2021).
Workers employed part-time, % of employed people
The incidence of part-time employment, also known as the part-time employment rate, represents the percentage of employment that is part time. Part time employment in this table is based on a common definition of less than 35 actual weekly hours worked. It is derived from both the indicator on employment by sex and actual weekly hours worked.
Period: 2019 or most recent year available
Source: World Economic Forum’s calculations based on International Labour Organization (ILO), ILOSTAT database (accessed 1 February 2021).
Gender pay gap (OECD only), %
The gender wage gap is defined as the difference between male and female median wages divided by male median wages. Wages are computed for full-time equivalent dependent employees and are expressed in US$ using current exchange rates and US$ Purchasing Power Parity rates (PPPs) for private consumption expenditures as conversion factors. For more details about the computation of wage estimates, refer to http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/average_wages.pdf.
Period: 2019 or latest year available
Source: OECD, Employment database.
Proportion of unpaid work per day, % of a 24-hour day
Share of average time spent on unpaid domestic work by women relative to that of men. Unpaid domestic work includes care and volunteer work and is expressed as a share of a 24-hour period.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Advancement of women to leadership roles, 1–7 (best)
Response to the survey question: “In your country, to what extent do companies provide women with the same opportunities as men to rise to positions of leadership?” 1=not at all; 7=to a great extent.
Period: 2019–2020
Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey (EOS).
Gender parity in tech roles, 1–7 (best)
Response to the survey question: “In your country, to what extent are women entering information technology roles (across all sectors)?” 1=not at all; 7=to a great extent, the rate is equal to that of men.
Period: 2019–2020
Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey (EOS).
Boards of listed companies, % board members
Share of board members of listed companies that are women. “Board members” refers to all members of the highest decision-making body in the given company, such as the board of directors for a company in a unitary system or the supervisory
board in the case of a company in a two-tier system.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Employment database.
Firms with female majority ownership, % firms
Percentage of firms answering, “More than 50%” to the question “What percentage of the firm is owned by females?”. For African countries surveyed in 2009–2011, this indicator is the percentage of companies answering, “Majority are women” or “All women” to the question “Are the owners of the firm?”. For more details refer to: https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/content/dam/enterprisesurveys/documents/methodology/Indicator-Descriptions.pdf.
Period: 2019
Source: World Bank Enterprise Survey.
Firms with female top managers, % firms
Firms with female top manager refers to the percentage of firms in the private sector who have females as top managers. “Top manager” refers to the highest-ranking manager or CEO of the establishment. This person may be the owner if he/she works as the manager of the firm. The results are based on surveys of more than 100,000 private firms.
Period: 2019
Source: World Bank Enterprise Survey.
Share of workers in informal sector, % workers
This is the ratio of employment of women/men in the informal sector to the total employment (irrespective of the informality/formality) of women/ men. Employment in the informal sector refers all persons who, during a given reference period, were employed in at least one informal sector enterprise, irrespective of their status in employment and whether it was their main or a secondary job. An informal sector enterprise is (1) an unincorporated enterprise and (2) a market enterprise (i.e. it sells at least some of the goods or services it produces), and (3) meets at least one of the following criteria: (i) the enterprise is not registered, (ii) the employees of the enterprise are not registered, or (iii) the number of persons engaged on a continuous basis is below a threshold determined by the country.
Period: 2019
Source: International Labour Organization, ILOSTAT.
Access to Finance
Right to hold a bank account and get credit, 0–1 (worst)
Index measuring whether women and men have the same legal rights to open a bank account and obtain credit in a formal financial institution. For each case, the following scores are assigned: 0 = Women and men have the same rights to open a bank account and obtain credit at a formal financial institution, without legal exceptions regarding some groups of women. Customary, religious and traditional laws or practices do not discriminate against women’s above legal rights; 0.25 = Women and men have the same rights to open a bank account and obtain credit at a formal financial institution to women and men, without legal exceptions regarding some groups of women. However, some customary, religious or traditional practices or laws discriminate against women’s legal rights; 0.5 = Women and men have the same rights to open a bank account and obtain credit at a formal financial institution to women and men. However, this does not apply to all groups of women; 0.75 = Women and men have the same rights to open a bank account at a formal financial institution. However, women do not have the same rights as men to obtain credit; 1 = Women do not have the same rights as men to open a bank account at a formal financial institution.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Inheritance rights for daughters, 0–1 (worst)
Index measuring whether women and men have the same legal rights to inheritance of land and non-land assets. For each case, the following scores are assigned: 0 = Widows and daughters enjoy the same rights as widowers and sons to inherit land and non-land assets. This applies to all groups of women. Customary, religious and traditional laws or practices do not discriminate against women’s inheritance rights; 0.25 = Widows and daughters enjoy the same rights as widowers and sons to inherit land and non-land assets. This applies to all groups of women. However, there are some customary, religious or traditional laws that discriminate against women’s inheritance rights; 0.5 = Widows and daughters enjoy the same rights as widowers and sons to inherit land and non-land assets. However, this does not apply to all groups of women; 0.75 = Widows or daughters do not enjoy the same rights as widowers and sons to inherit land and/or non-land assets; 1 = Widows and daughters do not enjoy the same rights as widowers and sons to inherit land and/or non-land assets.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Women’s access to land use, control & ownership, 0–1 (worst)
Index measuring whether women and men have the same legal rights and secure access to land assets. For each case, the following scores are assigned: 0 = Women and men have the same legal rights and secure access to land assets, without legal exceptions regarding some groups of women. Customary, religious and traditional laws or practices do not discriminate against women’s legal rights. 0.25 = Women and men have the same legal rights and secure access to land assets, without legal exceptions regarding some groups of women. However, some customary, religious or traditional practices or laws discriminate against women’s legal right; 0.5 = Women and men have the same legal rights and secure access to land assets. However, this does not apply to all groups of women; 0.75 = Women and men have the same legal rights to own land assets, but not to use, make decisions and/or use land assets as collateral; 1 = Women do not have the same legal rights as men to own land assets.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Women’s access to non-land assets use, control & ownership, 0–1 (worst)
Index measuring whether women and men have the same legal rights and secure access to nonland assets. For each case, the following scores are assigned: 0 = Women and men have the same legal rights and secure access to non-land assets, without legal exceptions regarding some groups of women. Customary, religious and traditional laws or practices do not discriminate against women’s legal rights; 0.25 = Women and men have the same legal rights and secure access to non-land assets, without legal exceptions regarding some groups of women. However, some customary, religious or traditional practices or laws discriminate against women’s legal right; 0.5 = Women and men have the same legal rights and secure access to nonland assets. However, this does not apply to all groups of women; 0.75 = Women and men have the same legal rights to own non-land assets, but not to use, make decisions and/or use non-land assets as collateral; 1 = Women do not have the same legal rights as men to own non-land assets.
Period: 2018
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Civil and Political Freedom
Year women received right to vote
Year women received right to vote. Refers to the year in which the right to vote or stand for election on a universal and equal basis was recognized. Where two years are shown, the first refers to the first partial recognition of the right to vote or stand for election.
Period: Situation as of 2020
Source: World Economic Forum’s calculations.
Number of female heads of state to date
The number of women who have ever taken office over the past fifty-year period as head of state or head of government in a country.
Period: 1971-2020
Source: World Economic Forum’s calculations.
Election list quotas for women, national, yes/no
Reports if a country has in place electoral laws specifying quotas for female candidates in national elections to the lower parliamentary house.
Period: 2020
Source: Quotaproject.org.
Party membership quotas, voluntary, yes/no
Reports if a country has in place voluntary quotas specifying the number of women for political party membership.
Period: 2020
Source: Quotaproject.org.
Seats held in upper house, % total seats
Percentage of women holding seats in the higher house of representatives as a share of total seats. Applies only to bicameral parliamentary systems.
Period: Situation as of 1 January 2021
Source: Inter-parliamentary Union.
Right to equal justice, 0–1 (worst)
Index measuring whether women and men have the same rights to provide testimony in court, hold public or political office in the judiciary and sue. For each case, the following scores are assigned: 0 = A woman’s testimony holds the same evidentiary weight as a man’s in all types of court cases and women have the same rights as men to sue and to hold public or political office in the judiciary. Customary, religious and traditional laws or practices do not discriminate against women’s legal right to sue, to provide testimony in court or to be a judge, advocate or other court officer; 0.25 = A woman’s testimony holds the same evidentiary weight as a man’s in all types of court cases and women have the same rights as men to sue and to hold public or political office in the judiciary. Women’s testimonies carry the same evidentiary weight in customary/religious courts/tribunals. However, some customary, traditional or religious practices or laws discriminate against women’s legal right to sue, to provide testimony in court or to be a judge, advocate or other court officer; 0.5 = A woman’s testimony holds the same evidentiary weight as a man’s in all types of court cases and women have the same rights as men to sue. However, women do not have the same right as men to hold public or political office in the judiciary; 0.75 = Women and men have the same rights to sue. However, a woman’s testimony does not hold the same evidentiary weight as a man’s in all types of court cases; 1 = Women and men do not have the same rights to sue.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Right to travel outside the country, 0–1 (worst)
Index measuring whether women and men have the same rights to apply for national identity cards (if applicable) and passports and travel outside the country. For each case, the following scores are assigned: 0 = Women and men have the same rights to apply for national identity cards (if applicable) and passports and to travel outside the country, without legal exceptions regarding some groups of women. Customary, religious and traditional laws or practices do not discriminate against these rights; 0.25 = Women and men have the same rights to apply for national identity cards (if applicable) and passports and to travel outside the country, without legal exceptions regarding some groups of women. However, some customary, traditional or religious practices or laws discriminate against these rights; 0.5 = Women and men have the same rights to apply for national identity cards (if applicable) and passports and to travel outside the country. However, this does not apply to all groups
of women; 0.75 = Women do not have the same rights as men to apply for national identity cards (if applicable) or passports or to travel outside the country; 1 = Women do not have the same rights as men to apply for national identity cards (if applicable) or passports and to travel outside the country.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Family and Care
Mean age of women at birth of first child
The mean age of mothers at first child’s birth is defined as the average completed year of age of women when their first child is born.
Period: 2015–2020 estimates
Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Population Prospects 2019 Special Aggregates, Online Edition. Rev. 1.
Average number of children per woman
Measures the average number of children a hypothetical cohort of women would have at the end of their reproductive period if they were subject during their whole lives to the fertility rates of a given period and if they were not subject to mortality.
Period: 2015–2020 estimates
Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Population Prospects 2019 Special Aggregates, Online Edition. Rev. 1.
Women’s unmet demand for family planning, % women 15–49
Percentage of currently married or in-union women of reproductive age (15–49) who want to stop or delay childbearing but are not using any method of contraception.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Right to divorce, 0–1 (worst)
Index measuring whether women and men have the same legal rights to initiate divorce and have the same requirements for divorce or annulment. For each case, the following scores are assigned: 0 = Women have the same rights to initiate divorce and the same requirements to finalize divorce or annulment as men, without negative repercussions from their parental authority. This applies to all groups of women. Customary, religious and traditional laws or practices do not discriminate against women’s rights regarding divorce or parental authority after divorce; 0.25 = Women have the same rights to initiate divorce and the same requirements to finalize divorce or annulment as men, without negative repercussions from their parental authority. This applies to all groups of women. However, there are some customary, religious or traditional laws or practices that discriminate against women’s rights regarding divorce and/or parental authority after divorce; 0.5 = Women have the same rights to initiate divorce and the same requirements to finalize divorce or annulment as men, without negative repercussions from their parental authority. However, this does not apply to all groups of women; 0.75 = Women do not have the same rights over divorce as men: either their rights to initiate divorce and/ or the requirements to finalize divorce or annulment are unequal, or their freedom from parental authority after divorce is restricted; 1 = Women do not have the same rights over divorce as men: their rights to initiate divorce and/or the requirements to finalize divorce or annulment are unequal, and their freedom from parental authority after divorce is restricted.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Child marriage, % women 15–19
Percentage of girls aged 15–19 years who are or have ever been married, divorced, widowed or in an informal union.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Length of maternity/paternity leave (days), weeks
Number of weeks of job-protected leave available for mothers/fathers just before and after childbirth. For countries where there is no separate legislation for maternity leave, the weeks of parental leave reserved for the exclusive use of mothers around childbirth are reported. Paid father-specific leave refers to the number of paid weeks reserved for the exclusive use of fathers, including entitlements to paid paternity leave, ‘father quotas’ or periods of paid parental leave that can be used only by the father and cannot be transferred to the mother, and any weeks of paid sharable leave that must be taken by the father in order for the family to qualify for ‘bonus’ weeks of parental leave.
Period: 2018
Source: OECD, Family database.
Wages paid during maternity/paternity leave, % annual gross wage
Average share of gross annual wage paid. It refers to the proportion of previous earnings replaced by the benefit over the length of the paid leave entitlement for a person earning 100% of average national full-time earnings. For maternity leaves, it refers to paid parental leave and subsequent periods of paid home care leave to care for young children. For paternity leave rates, information refers to entitlements to paternity leave, ‘father quotas’ or periods of parental leave that can be used only by the father and cannot be transferred to the mother, and any weeks of sharable leave that must be taken by the father in order for the family to qualify for ‘bonus’ weeks of parental leave.
Period: 2018
Source: OECD, Family database.
Public childcare expenditure, % GDP
Total public expenditure on early childhood education and care, as percentage of GDP. Public expenditure on early childhood education and care covers all public spending (in cash or in kind) towards formal day-care services (e.g. crèches, day-care centres, and family day care, generally aimed at children aged 0 to 2, inclusive) and pre-primary education services (including kindergartens and day-care centres which usually provide an educational content as well as traditional care for children aged from 3 to 5, inclusive).
Period: 2017 or most recent year available
Source: OECD, Family database.
Education and Skills
STEMS, attainment %
Percentage of male/female tertiary education graduates from STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) programmes.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Agri., Forestry, Fisheries & Veterinary, % attainment
Percentage of male/female tertiary education graduates from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Arts & Humanities, % attainment
Percentage of male/female tertiary education graduates from Arts and Humanities programmes.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Business, Admin. & Law, % attainment
Percentage of male/female tertiary education graduates from Business, Administration and Law programmes.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Education, % attainment
Percentage of male/female tertiary education graduates from Education programmes.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Engineering, Manuf. & Construction, % attainment
Percentage of male/female tertiary education graduates from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Health & Welfare, % attainment
Percentage of male/female tertiary education graduates from Health and Welfare programmes.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Information & Comm. Technologies, % attainment
Percentage of male/female graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Natural Sci., Mathematics & Statistics, % attainment
Percentage of male/female tertiary education graduates from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Services, % attainment
Percentage of male/female tertiary education graduates from Services programmes.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Social Sci., Journalism & Information, % attainment
Percentage of male/female tertiary education graduates from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Vocational training, % attainment
Percentage of 15–24-year-old girls/ boys enrolled in vocational education to the total 15–24-year-old population.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
PhD graduates, % attainment
Percentage of 25+ year-old women/men who have attained a doctoral degree or equivalent (ISCED 8) relative to the total population of over-25-year-olds.
Period: 2018 or latest year available
Source: UNESCO, Education database.
Health
Maternal mortality, deaths per 100,000 live births
Number of female deaths in a specific year from any cause related to or aggravated by pregnancy or its management (excluding accidental or incidental causes) during pregnancy and childbirth, or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy, per 100,000 live births.
Period: 2017 estimates
Source: World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory (GHO) Data Repository, “Maternal deaths” indicator (accessed 19 January 2021).
Prevalence of gender violence in lifetime, % women
Percentage of ever-partnered women who ever suffered intimate partner physical and/or sexual violence.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Law permits abortion to preserve a woman’s health, 0–1 (worst)
Index measuring whether the legal framework protects women’s reproductive health and rights. For each case, the following scores are assigned: 0 = The legal framework protects women’s reproductive health and rights in case of unwanted pregnancy, without any justifications; 0.25 = The legal framework protects women’s reproductive health and rights in case of unwanted pregnancy, but requires justifications; 0.5 = The legal framework only protects women’s reproductive health and rights in case of unwanted pregnancy with some justifications; 0.75 = The legal framework only protects women’s reproductive health and rights in case of unwanted pregnancy with strict justifications; 1 = The legal framework does not protect women’s reproductive health and rights in case of unwanted pregnancy.
Period: 2019
Source: OECD, Gender, Institutions and Development Database (GID-DB).
Births attended by skilled personnel, % live births
Share of live births attended by skilled health personnel to total live births in a given year.
Period: 2018–2019 or most recent period available
Source: World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory Data Repository, “Births attended by skilled health personnel” indicator (accessed 19 January 2021).
Antenatal care, at least four visits, % women 15–49
Percentage of women aged 15–49 with a live birth in a given time period that received antenatal care provided by skilled health personnel (doctors, nurses or midwives) at least four times during pregnancy.
Period: 2018 or most recent year available
Source: UNICEF, Maternal and Newborn Health Coverage Database (Last Update: August 2020).